Fiqh - Adnan Oktar - Harun Yahya - Harun Yahya

HARUN YAHYA

All Works
Books
Articles
Videos
Voices
Images
Quotes
Other

WHO IS ADNAN OKTAR?

Harun YahyaWHO IS ADNAN OKTAR?

WORKS

Books Articles Videos Voices Images Quotes Other

TOPICS

Cavour Vatican Socialism Illumination French Revolution Convert Sabbatean Jacobinism Masonic Media Political Zionism Young Turk The Committee of Union and Progress Abdulhamid Anti-Nazi World Zionist Organization Nuremberg Laws Mussolini World War I Adolf Eichmann Goyim The Rothschild Dynasty Think-Thank CFR Rockefeller Cold War Stalin October Revolution Soviet Union Bilderberg Vietnam AIPAC Lobby fair Southeast Greece New World Order Red Sea geopolitics veteran tax customs 2023 antelope bull Eurasia Islam Council Nobel Prize Hospital Social Security Institution Ali Babacan Turgut Ozal assassination Gaffar Okkan Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Rosetta Nebula Astronomy Rose Damascus Sermon nuclear weapon Iyad Allawi Nautilus submarine diving cell Ali Bardakoglu Television Televole Canakkale

One cannot make people pious by merely telling them the Islamic jurisprudence [fıqh]. They should be taught about the facts of faith, about the miracles of the Quran. The issues should be explained scientifically. Both the mind and the heart have to be convinced at the same time.

One cannot make people pious by merely telling them the Islamic jurisprudence [fıqh]. They should be taught about the facts of faith, about the miracles of the Quran. The issues should be explained scientifically. Both the mind and the heart have to be convinced at the same time.

They need to see that no result can be attained through explanations made about the Islamic law. The best effort that can be carried out is to verify one's faith and to increase his fear from Allah. Enabling one to become absolutely sure of the existence of Allah and having the verification of that faith settle in his heart and enwrap his soul and heart, then it would be okay. Or else simply saying "this is religiously forbidden and that is religiously lawful" would not have an effect.

They need to see that no result can be attained through explanations made about the Islamic law. The best effort that can be carried out is to verify one's faith and to increase his fear from Allah. Enabling one to become absolutely sure of the existence of Allah and having the verification of that faith settle in his heart and enwrap his soul and heart, then it would be okay. Or else simply saying "this is religiously forbidden and that is religiously lawful" would not have an effect.

The faith of the youth should be reinforced but that cannot be done through giving them knowledge of religious law. I mean knowledge of religious love would not increase people's faith. It would be partial even if it did. Faith increases through facts leading to faith, through scientific evidence. There should be a way of explaining that addresses people's mind, people's hearts.

The faith of the youth should be reinforced but that cannot be done through giving them knowledge of religious law. I mean knowledge of religious love would not increase people's faith. It would be partial even if it did. Faith increases through facts leading to faith, through scientific evidence. There should be a way of explaining that addresses people's mind, people's hearts.

It is not possible to clear away the damage caused by Darwinism through fikh [the canon law], a scientific and philosophical explanation is required for that.

It is not possible to clear away the damage caused by Darwinism through fikh [the canon law], a scientific and philosophical explanation is required for that.

Is there a problem of jurisprudence or weakness of faith? The weakness of faith. This is the problem of the entire world.

Is there a problem of jurisprudence or weakness of faith? The weakness of faith. This is the problem of the entire world.

5

1

1