Adnan Oktar A9 TV; April 7th, 2016

Under the name of Rumism, they are trying to disseminate irreligiousness. All our brothers should be cautious against this danger.

Good parts of the philosophy of Rumi can be accepted. But we will never accept the wrong parts. We can never accept the misogyny, anti-Turkish sentiment, homosexuality or evolutionary ideas in Rumism.

Many people who deny God and oppose Islam embrace the philosophy of Rumi. Muslims should see the ploy here.

British shadow state was aiming to suffocate the Islamic world with the philosophy of Rumism.
 We realized this plot on time and thwarted their plots
.

British secret state uses people with obsequious characters with promises of financial gain. They built a network of sycophant people. These sycophant people are all Darwinist, materialists but pretend to be Muslims. They are also all Rumi followers.

It is crucial that stories of sexual perversion in books claimed to be written by Rumi are removed from these books.

It is strange that some atheists, who are against God, the Qur’an and Divine religions, are very fond of Rumism. Muslims should see the danger here.

In the works written in the name of Mawlana, in other words in Rumism, there is a blatant propaganda for homosexuality and opposition to women.

In the books written in the name of Rumi there are very perverted statements: We can’t feign ignorance about them. They need to be omitted.

The characteristics of shadow states are; they always look down on people, hold them in low regard, oppress them and even attempt to massacre them. And their main philosophies are Darwinism, homosexuality, and the philosophy of Rumi.

They back Rumi not because they love him, but since they find the philosophy of irreligiosity in the books claimed to be written by him.

Some people who never talk about God, our Prophet and the Qur'an constantly advocate books that were allegedly written by Rumi.

Sheikh Nazim Al-Qubrusi is Naqshbandi. He is not Maulawi.

We criticise parts from the Mawlana's book that contradict the Qur'an. It is possible that Mawlana did not write or add these parts.

The world shadow state considers Rumism as a counter-religion against Islam. They have made extensive preparations, establishing the foundations of a religion in secrecy. Since they know they cannot separate people away from Islam, they consider Rumism as a replacement for it.

The Rumi philosophy is used by the British Deep State to take Muslims under control. This is not same as the Mawlavism that is widely known in Anatolia.

Some parts in the books claimed to be written by Mawlana constitute the basis of the philosophy of Rumi. It might also be possible that those inappropriate parts have been added to Masnawi later on.

When we criticize Rumism, we are criticizing the deviant philosophy of the British Deep State, not the Anatolian Mawlavi order.

Bayju Noyan, one of the closest disciples of Rumi, was a murderer who killed thousands of Muslims while he was in Hulagu Khan’s army.

Hulagu, one of the worst antichrists in the history of Islam, made Mawlana the governor of Anatolia and supported him morally and financially. Hulagu refused to recognize any scholar, endowment, charity or religious foundation that was not loyal to Mawlana.

The British shadow state apparatus is trying to get the Turkish nation to adopt a new religion called Rumism, Mawlavism and to become followers of Rumi. They reject Islam and the Qur’an, but they say, ‘We are followers of Mawlana.’

Galata was the center of the Mevlevi houses. That’s why the members of the British deep state revere it. That neighborhood is sacred to them; they regard it as the meeting point of their spies, of their agents.

It is wrong to regard religion as dogma and rituals and to reconcile religion with the West’s Rumi philosophy.

If a person is not offended when inappropriate things are said about God, about the Qur'an, but instead makes a loud noise thinking Mawlana is being insulted, then that would be idolizing him.

A Muslim would be falling astray if he accepts the abnormal statements made in the name of Mawlana. We do not know if Mawlana really made those statements or not but those statements are being published in the Masnavi known as his book: It is not possible to accept that.