Adnan Oktar A9 TV; April 17th, 2013

MHP lays stress on national discontent. Alright it is a fact that our government shows a candid effort but it is really required as well. One circle lays stress on vigilance, the other strives for solution. That is a balance. That is not something against the government, it is to its advantage.

It is beneficial to have opposition. It would strengthen the government indirectly. But it would not be right to carry out studies that might weaken the government. The wise thing to do is to strengthen the hand of the government against both domestic and foreign forces.

Our government should consider the internet as the most crucial matter. There should be wireless access to the internet all over Turkey and all kinds of restrictions on the internet should be abolished. Everyone should be able to log on to internet whenever they like. Putting a restriction on internet is something like putting a lock on a book and saying ; “you cannot read!”

Our government should be tenacious about uniting with Greece.

The speeches of the opposition keep our people sharp and alive.

It is always good to have a sound opposition to the government but this opposition should not be distructive.

It is not acceptable to leave the government to its own means only to watch the happenings and thus wear out the government. We, as a nation, should support them with all our might.

Our government made the deep state organization that has been around for the last 150 years, kneel down. Well done. Masha'Allah.

Everyone should support the struggle the government gives against the deep state organizations.

Adverse explanations bring about wealth and power. It brings about vigilance. It brings about confidence in our people. It is beneficial, not harmful.

It is not acceptable to make opposition to everything, one should support what is right.

Our Prime Minister is a person open to criticism and suggestions. But that cannot be done by putting someone on shame, ideas should be voiced eloquently.

There is no harm in the criticisms of European Parliament about Tukey. We would benefit from it if there are any justified aspects.

The increase in the number of people that stand against, that talks sharp and harsh words, that displays offensive manners would increase the good deeds a Muslim attains.

The compliments a Muslim pays to another Muslim would cheer them up and give way to affection. Speaking against one person constantly, constantly criticizing that person would darken the heart and cause pain. The right and the beautiful should be giving its due.

Criticisms are nice; criticisms increase one's quality and beauty. They help people in finding the truth.

There is no power to be ascribed to Esad, Putin has the power. The minute Putin withdraws his support from Syria, the regime will be overthrown. Syrian dissidents should back Putin.

A monotonous intellectual system is not good. The existence of opposition and wealth of ideas, are necessary and beautiful.

Swearing is a very vulgar and atrocious act. Why is there the need to swear when it is possible to make reasonable criticism.

Anyone who likes can criticize religion but no one can insult. I criticize communism but I would not let anyone insult communism, I would not let anyone curse them.

Lethal criticism is not acceptable, destructive criticism is not acceptable. Criticisms should be constructive.

What is essential is to criticize Darwinism in the scientific sense.

Darwinist-materialist education brings about loveless and ferocious people.

As we talk, the system of the dajjal (antichrist) spiritually melts like salt melts in water.

The left wing is very well organized all over the world, they have very intricate connections. When there is something that is not in the interest of the left wing, they instantly form an alliance.