Why?

Q: What role did social Darwinism play in the outbreak of World War I?

Social Darwinism applied flawed theories of competition to human society, causing leaders to view war as a cleansing and necessary biological struggle. This mentality replaced moral values with a belief that bloodshed was a natural and inevitable part of the human experience.

Q: How did European leaders justify their participation in the war?

Leaders and military officials often cited so-called laws of nature, claiming that conflict was a biological necessity that provided a just decision. By viewing war as an inescapable struggle, they rejected the path of peace and mercy in favor of aggression.

Q: What is the alternative to the materialist philosophy of conflict?

The alternative is the morality of faith, which is grounded in the commands of God to pursue love, fraternity, and peace. This way of life requires people to do good, avoid corruption, and value the unique spirit God has gifted to every human being.

Q: How does the Qur'an address the act of kindling war?

The Qur'an characterizes those who kindle the fires of war as corrupters of the earth. It emphasizes that God does not love such corruption and commands humanity to act with goodness and mercy instead.

Abstract

This video explores the ideological roots of World War I, identifying social Darwinism as a primary catalyst for the conflict. By viewing humanity through a materialist lens of struggle and competition, European leaders rejected divine teachings of love and mercy. The video argues that shifting away from these misguided materialist philosophies toward Qur'anic values is essential for achieving lasting global peace.