 |
MushroomAge: 100 million years old The mushroom fossil pictured shows that 100 million years ago, these life forms were in existence with all their functions and characteristics fully present, and have not changed at all since then. In exactly the same way, millions of fossils unearthed since the mid-18th century reveal, that evolution never took place. Therefore, paleontologists who abandon their preconceptions must also abandon evolution and Darwinism, as is made clear in the book A Closer Loot at the Evidence: “Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides of seeing evolution, it has presented some nasty difficulties for evolutionists, the most notorious of which is the presence of 'gaps' in the fossil record." Richard L. & Christina E. Kleiss, A Closer Look at the Evidence, Search for the Truth Publications, Mart 2004, p. January |
 |
Soldier BeetleAge: 100 million years old The beetle pictured, a member of the Cantharidae family, is important evidence that soldier beetles were using their same chemical defense mechanism 100 million years ago. According to a scientific paper published by Oregon University’s George Poinar, an authority on amber, specimens of insects that used chemical defenses had previously been discovered in the fossil record. For example, the poison sacs of various squids of the Jurassic period, soldier termites in Dominican ambers contained the defensive secretions. Other Dominican ambers had been discovered containing various kinds of worms that also employed a similar mechanism. But no such fossil specimen of that age of a soldier beetle using that mechanism had ever been encountered before. If any living thing made full use of an exceptionally complex defense mechanism 100 million years ago—back when evolutionists maintain that life was supposedly very primitive—then it is of course impossible to use evolution to explain it. This insect was fossilized while spraying its enemy with a defensivechemical secretion. |
 |
Ant LionAge: 100 million years old According to evolutionists’ unscientific claims, butterflies and elephants, whales and ants, orchids and stinging nettles, human beings and fish all supposedly share the same common ancestor. The fossil record is the most important evidence disproving that claim. Life forms are preserved exactly as they were tens of thousands, tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of years in the past. Thus fossils of life forms that once existed should show by what imaginary transitional stages they assumed their present forms. Traces of their so-called common ancestors should also be encountered. Yet no intermediate stages, nor any supposed common ancestors of the kind claimed by evolutionists, can be seen anywhere in the fossil record. Millions specimens like the 100-million-year-old ant lion pictured show that living things have always remained unchanged. In other words, the theory of evolution remains unproven. |
 |
Scorpion FlyAge: 100 million years old Evolutionist publications portray every new fossil discovery as supposedly supporting the theory of evolution. Reports that appear under such headlines as “Traces of Our Ancestors Found,” “Insect Evolution Finally Deciphered” or “Forerunner of the Fly Discovered,” but a close reading clearly reveals that nothing in these findings actually supports evolution at all. On the contrary, all the facts refute evolution. But the facts are dismissed by way of biased reporting, scientific truths are ignored, and fictitious Darwinist myths are repeated instead of the scientific realities. However, it is no longer possible for the public to believe such fantasies. Countless fossils, like the specimen illustrated, have been exhibited, and the fact that the origin of life does not lie in evolution has been proven with indisputable evidence. |
 |
Marsh BeetleAge: 50 million years old Darwinists maintain that when mud was transformed as the work of chance by such natural phenomena as lightning over a long period, the result was possible for roses, carnations, birds, insects and humans who build cities, investigate the subparticles of the atom, compose symphonies and voyage into outer space. Even a primary-school student would regard this ludicrous, and illogical idea as deficient in logic, but for purely ideological reasons, evolutionists maintain it in all seriousness. In a paper published in Scientific American magazine, the evolutionist George Wald described at length how chance could do anything if given sufficient time. As he went on to say: “Given so much time, the 'impossible' becomes possible, the possible probable, and the probable virtually certain. One has only to wait: time itself performs the miracles.” (George Wald, "The origin of life'. Scientific American, vol. 191 (2), August 1954, p.48)) Wald’s words are most striking examples of evolutionist illogicality. The fact is that even after the passage of 2 billion or 100 billion years, stones and dirt will never be able to develop into human beings that feel, think, make judgments, rejoice, produce works of art, research, love and are loved by others. Life is the work of our Sublime and Mighty Lord, not of blind chance. |
 |
Snail ShellAge: 100 million years old The specimen amber shown here is 100 million years old and contains a snail shell. The fact that there is no difference between the shells of present-day snails and those alive 100 million years ago totally invalidates evolutionists’ claims. Had snails evolved, as evolutionists maintain, then the structure of their shells 100 million years ago should be very different to that of shells today. But there is not the slightest difference between them, and this is one of the proofs that evolution never took place, and that Creation is the origin of life. |
 |
Flutter FlyAge: 50 million years old By evaluating scientific findings from a neutral perspective, anyone can easily see that Darwin’s claims are untrue. To date, for example, Darwin’s claim that living species undergo small inherited changes over the course of time has not been supported by any scientific data. All we have are fantasies, the work of Darwinists’ imaginations, and ideological insistence. The well-known British biologist Brian Goodwin describes how Darwin’s theory enjoys no scientific backing: Darwin's assumption that the tree of life is a consequence of the gradual accumulation of small hereditary differences appears to be without significant support. Some other process is responsible for the remergent properties of life, those distinctive features that separate one group of organisms from another—fishes and amphibians, worms and insects, horsetails and grasses. (George Wald, "The origin of life”, Scientific American, vol. 191 (2), August 1954, p.48)By referring to another process as responsible for the emergence of living things, Goodwin is actually referring to the fact of Creation, although he is reluctant to openly describe it as such. Yet the fact that he is so unwilling to admit can still be seen by anyone possessed of reason.
|
 |
Reptilian FootAge: 100 million years old Fossils in amber are important examples of the kinds of forest life that existed tens of millions of years ago. Research into amber specimens provides information about not only the life forms preserved in them, but also about their habitats and other living things in their ecosystem. This 100-million-year-old fossil shows how reptilian feet have remained unchanged despite the passage of so much time. Whatever characteristics living reptiles have now, they are the same as to those living 100 million years ago. |
 |
Dwarf Six-Eyed Spider (Oonopidae)Age: 50 million years old In his book The Nature of the Fossil Record, Derek Ager makes an important admission: It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as a student . . . have now been debunked. (Derek Ager The Nature of the Fossil Record, Proceedings of the Geological Association, Vol. 87, No. 2 (1976), pp. 131-159)Ager wrote those words in 1976. The levels now reached by science and technology have disproved all the claims of evolution. One of the most important evidence establishing this is the fossil record. Countless specimen, such as the 50-million-year-old spider pictured, totally refute Darwins theory.
|
 |
False Flower Beetle (Scraptiidae)Age: 50 million years old If any insect that existed 50 million years ago had all the organs and physical features possessed by the same insect today, then it is impossible to state that this life form has achieved its present form through evolution. Research over the last 150 years or so has produced no candidates for the supposed ancestor of the more than 1 million known species of insects. Nor is it likely for any answer to be forthcoming in the future, because insects are not descended from any alleged common forebear. Insects did not assume their present-day forms through evolution. Every species is created with its own particular characteristics and never changes so long as that species survives. The fossil record is the most important proof of that. |
 |
Bee FlyAge: 50 million years old Even after some 150 years of fossil research, not even one intermediate form fossil showing a link between two different life forms has ever been found. Every fossil discovered reveals that living things have come into being with all their characteristics already intact, and have been created. One such fossil is the 50-million-year-old bee fly pictured. Bee flies have remained unaltered and have maintained all their characteristics despite the intervening 50 million years—living proof that evolution never occurred. |
 |
Turkey GnatAge: 50 million years old If evolutionist claims were true, and living species were constantly changing since the day they first appeared, then species alive tens of millions of years ago should not at all resemble those living today. Development, change and progress should be observed everywhere. Yet the fossil record reveals the exact opposite. The scenarios of progressive development that appear in evolutionist papers and journals are all fantasies, totally divorced from reality—as is described even in evolutionist books: Has there been progress in evolution? Are recent plants and animals more advanced then their predecessor, or at least more complex? Of course not. (Richard Ellis, Aquagenesis, The Origin and Evolution of Life in the Sea, Penguin Books, 2001, p. 7)
|
 |
Ant-Like Stone Beetle (Scydmaenidae)Age: 100 million years old One hundred million years is a relatively long time for any life form’s completion of the supposed evolutionary development. If evolutionists’ views were accurate, then over the course of all that time, ant-like stone beetles should have turned into very different forms and should bear no resemblance to beetles still alive today. Yet despite the passage of millions of years, ant-like stone beetles—like all other life forms—have undergone not the slightest change. They were the same 100 million years ago as they are today, which makes any reference to evolution impossible. |
 |
Crane Fly (Tipulidae)Age: 100 million years old Fossils are exceedingly significant because they clearly reveal, in a manner that anyone can understand, that evolution never happened. That is why the French zoologist Pierre Grassé says: Naturalists must remember that the process of evolution is revealed only through fossil forms. A knowledge of paleontology is, therefore, a prerequisite; only paleontology can provide them with the evidence of evolution. (Pierre Grassé, Evolution of Living Organisms, New York: Academic Press, 1977, p. 297)Yet all the work carried out by paleontologists over the past 150 years has presented evolutionists with a terrible disappointment. No traces of the past have provided any findings in support of evolutionists’ claims. All the fossils so far unearthed, without exception, indicate that living things are the work of our Omniscient Lord, not of blind chance.
|
 |
False Metallic Wood-Boring Beetle (Throscidae)Age: 50 million years old One of the propaganda techniques Darwinists use most effectively is providing a detailed exposition of something that never happened as if it really took place. For example, evolutionist articles, describe mutations and natural selection at length, even though they do not have an ability to give rise to new species. They ascribe these fictitous mechanisms to a supposedly creative power (God is beyond that). The truth of the matter is very different. Yet because of this indoctrination, many people with scant knowledge of the subject imagine that evolution is undeniable, an inseparable cornerstone of biology. In fact, however, science has long since written off the theory of evolution. Arthur Koestler describes the misinterpretation of natural selection and mutation, which are portrayed as the two mechanisms of evolution, but which actually have no such power or effect at all: In the meantime, the educated public continues to believe that Darwin has provided all the relevant answers by the magic formula of random mutations plus natural selection—quite unaware of the fact that random mutations turned out to be irrelevant and natural selection a tautology.” (Luther D. Sunderland, Darwin’s Enigma, Master Book Publishers, California, 1988, p.32)
|
 |
HarvestmenAge: 50 million years old Living things of the order Opliones, of which there estimated to be some 6,400 species, are members of the class Arachnida (arachnids). The theory of evolution cannot explain how one single protein or the first living element formed, much less why living things have remained unaltered for tens of millions of years. One of the fossils that silence evolutionists is the 50-million-year-old harvestman pictured. The way that harvestmen have remained unchanged for so long cannot be explained in terms of evolution. There is only one possible explanation: Creation. |
 |
Snipe FlyAge: 50 million years old Darwinism’s basic claim is that living species constantly change and develop in a supposed process of evolution. Yet observation reveals no evidence to support this Darwinist fantasy. Scientific discoveries over the last 150 years have not confirmed Darwinism even once. On the contrary, every new finding has been a new death knell. One such discovery is the 50-million-year-old snipefly illustrated. This fossil is an evidence that like all other species of flies, snipe flies have never changed, and have never evolved. |
 |
Snake Fly (Raphidioptera)Age: 125 million years Snake flies, of which there are estimated to be 150 or so species, are members of the class Raphidioptera—another life form showing that evolution never took place. In fact, scientific circles are well aware that the fossil record does not support evolution. But because of their ideological dependance on the theory, they never openly admit this fact. In his book Aquagenesis, The Origin and Evolution of Life in the Sea, Richard Ellis states that fossils prove stasis, rather than the change expected by evolution: The fossil evidence does not provide ready answers to questions of descent or relationships, but it unequivocally demonstrates the durability and complexity of life’s history on Earth.” (Richard Ellis, Aquagenesis, The Origin and Evolution of Life in the Sea, Penguin Books, 2001, p. 6)
|
 |
Hyena SkullAge: 73 million years old The history of evolution is filled with hoaxes. Attempts have been made to portray fossils of various extinct life forms or even a few fragments of fossilized bone as evidence of imaginary transitions. Fossils of living species have long been described to the public by the evolutionists as living things that have been evolving. But a profound silence has now replaced all this misleading speculation regarding fossils. Eventually, as you can see from the 73-million-year-old hyena skull shown here, it was realized that many present-day life forms lived millions of years ago in exactly the same forms they have now and that therefore, they never evolved. The time has now come for evolutionists to put an end to their hoaxes and speculations about the myth of human evolution. |
 |
Lynx SkullAge: 65 million years old All the important details, including the teeth, of this animal can be seen in this 65-million-year-old skull. The universe created by God contains flawless marvels of Creation. Every manifestation of beauty created in the universe is also a manifestation of His omniscience and sublime artistry. It is God Who creates from nothing, and there are no bounds to His Creation. Darwinism tries to make people forget that we inhabit a universe filled with perfect details. In fact, however, anyone looking at all the innumerable living things and seeing how these, have all lived in exactly the same form for millions of years—as this 65-million-year-old lynx skull demonstrates—will be freed from this indoctrination and come to the conclusion we inhabit a world of true marvels. All entities are the work of Almighty God. |
 |
Jackal SkullAge: 51 million years old No fossil indicating that life forms share common ancestors has ever been found. In the fossil record, there is no sign that living things are in a constant state of change. Then why are Darwinists so determined to cling to their theory? Why do they insist on defending the idea that living things evolved, when there is so much evidence that they were in fact created by God? The reason is ideological. Defending the theory of evolution is of vital importance for materialist and atheist ideologies. No matter how much Darwinists persist in the theory of evolution, the fossil record constantly produces more evidence that totally discredits it. The 51-million-year-old jackal skull pictured is one such example. The fossil reveals that, just like turtles, tigers, foxes, mink, lions, rhinoceroses and all other living things, jackals never underwent evolution at any time. |
 |
Leopard SkullAge: 73 million years old Darwinists’ ruses and the techniques they use to mislead people are now totally futile. Faced with atlases that make the fact of Creation crystal-clear—and countless fossils that demonstrate how living things have never changed in the slightest—Darwinists have seen that all life forms were created out of nothing. Their ruses have been exposed and effectively neutralized. By itself, this 73-million-year-old leopard skull is sufficient evidence to show that all tales regarding the changes supposedly undergone by life forms are totally invalid. They show that leopards living 73 million years ago had exactly the same characteristics as leopards living today. The jaw structure and teeth of this fossil can be seen in great detail. |
 |
Zebra SkullAge: 45 million years old God has created all living things with their different appearances and forms. In the same way that their lifestyles and needs differ, so there are profound differences in their body structures. This means it is not difficult to describe the fossils that are unearthed, making it possible to establish the anatomical features of a living thing whose fossil remains have been discovered. The 45-million-year-old zebra fossil illustrated makes this distinction. It’s evident that there is no difference between the fossil’s characteristics and those of a present-day zebra’s skull. There is no doubt that this is one of God’s divine miracles. The scientific evidence to hand is too definitive for scientists to be able to deny, even if they are evolutionists. It’s a scientific fact that species have not changed, and they have undergone no evolutionary process. |
 |
Asian Wild Horse SkullAge: 33 million years old The myth of the horse evolution is one of Darwinism’s best-known frauds. This scenario—which many contemporary evolutionists admit is untrue—is still defended by a number of fanatical Darwinists. However, this claim is full of extraordinary inconsistencies and lacks any scientific evidence, and has been totally refuted. Horses have remained unchanged over millions of years. The 33-million-year-old Asian wild horse skull illustrated shows that horses lived in exactly the same way then as they do now. This by itself is sufficient to demolish all Darwinist claims about the alleged horse evolution. |
 |
Raccoon SkullAge: 4.3 million years old Fossil specimens dating back millions of years, when compared with present-day life forms, reveal that there was no transition in morphology and that evolution from one species to another never happened. This fact applies equally to ants and butterflies, polar bears and lizards, and fruit flies and zebras. Darwin’s theory of evolution is unsupported by any scientific findings whatsoever. No evidence to support it has ever been produced since Darwin’s day. And with every passing day, the fossil record makes that lack of evidence even more obvious. This 4.3-million-year-old raccoon skull clearly shows that Darwin was completely wrong. |
 |
Tibetan Wild Donkey SkullAge: 29 million years old Evolutionists’ attempts to portray the wild donkey as the ancestor of the horse are totally hollow. Fossils have proven that wild donkeys have always existed as wild donkeys, and are not descended from any other life form. The fossil illustrated shows that wild donkeys living 27 million years ago were identical to those living today—which effectively silences all evolutionist claims. New species did not emerge as the result of mutations and blind coincidences. It is Almighty God, Who possesses a sublime creative power, Who created them all. |
 |
Monkey SkullAge: 32 million years old Not one single fossil possessing half-ape and half-human characteristics has ever been found. All the fossils portrayed at one time or another as evidence for the supposed evolution of man have later been exposed as hoaxes, and all have been withdrawn by evolutionists themselves. All they have left are scenarios based on Darwinists’ imaginations. Concrete findings have proven that monkeys have always existed as monkeys, while human beings have always been human. One such finding is the 32-million-year-old monkey skull shown here. |
 |
Camel SkullAge: 3.9 million years old According to evolutionist claims, the camel’s large skull, long neck and humps must be the result of a large sequence of mutations. As a result, there should have been innumerable mammals with semi-lengthened necks, odd-shaped heads and incipient humps. These imaginary life forms should be encountered frequently in the fossil record, and there should be no trace of fully-formed camels dating back millions of years, like the one shown here. But data from the fossil record show that such imaginary transitional forms never existed. Camels never passed through any intermediate stages, and have always existed as fully-formed camels. |
 |
Grey Fox SkullAge: 78 million years old The theory of evolution—about which countless false pieces of evidence have been produced and which has been kept alive by the invention of totally incredible scenarios—has now come to the end of its life. People are realizing that they have faced a terrible deception. From now on, no scenario invented by Darwinists will have any effect, and their theory’s collapse will continue apace, because scientific findings totally refute evolution. This 78-million-year-old grey fox skull is just one of the proofs that are accelerating this collapse. Darwinism has been completely discredited in the face of living fossils. |
 |
Fisher Marten SkullAge: 78 million years old God has the power to create from nothing. Failing to comprehend this, Darwinists cannot or will not understand that God creates a living thing whenever He so desires, simply by commanding it to “Be!” This lack of belief and lack of awareness of the true facts underlie the illogical scenarios and false proofs they come up with. Yet people who are not influenced by the Darwinist spell have no difficulty in grasping the magnificent Creation in the world. Clearly, living things have been created and equipped with perfect systems. They have been the same down through their generations, since the moment they were first created. The 78-million-year-old fisher marten skull illustrated is one of the representatives of this reality. |
 |
Carribean Monk Seal SkullAge: 3.1 million years old Darwinists cannot account for the trilobite’s eye, which these crustaceans already possessed as long as 530 million years ago. Darwinists cannot explain how living things in the sea, on land and in the air appeared suddenly and survived unchanged for the entire course of their existence. Darwinists maintain that one species developed into another, but they cannot explain how a single original cell could change in such a way as to assume different functions in a multi-cellular creature. Darwinism is a theory at a dead end, and is gradually dying out as new discoveries are made with every passing day. The 3.1-million-year-old Caribbean monk seal skull shown here is one of the many proofs to accelerate this process of disappearance. |
 |
Rhinoceros SkullAge: 75 million years old Darwinists claim that living things are descended from one another and assumed their present form by way of gradual changes over time. If this claim were true, then it should be apparent from the fossil record. Yet the Earth produces nothing but fossils dating back millions of years that are identical to specimens alive today. There is not a single transitional form to verify Darwinists’ claims. All living things, from the smallest to the largest, existed millions of years ago in the same forms as they are today. If other living things never changed, then there are no rational and scientific grounds left for claiming that human beings changed. Humans have always been fully human, and have never altered. |
 |
Indian Civet CatAge: 48 million years old In 1993, Stephen Jay Gould wrote in the magazine Natural History about the way living species can be observed to have exactly the same characteristics throughout the fossil record: Stasis, or nonchange of most fossil species during their lengthy geological lifespans, was tacitly acknowledged by all paleontologists, but almost never studied explicitly because prevailing theory treated stasis as uninteresting nonevidence for nonevolution . . . [T]he overwhelming prevalence of stasis became an embarrassing feature of the fossil record, but left ignored as a manifestation of nothing (that is, nonevolution). (S. J. Gould, “Cordelia’s Dilemma”, Natural History, February, p. 10-18)The only reason why evolutionists refer to the stasis in the fossil record as “embarrassing” is that if living things experience no changes, that invalidates the theory of evolution. This information, which shows that evolution never happened, is evidence for the fact of Creation.
|
 |
Giraffe SkullAge: 65 million years old Giraffes are noted for their extraordinarily long necks. Darwinists hypothesized that the necks of these animals lengthened gradually as they stretched to reach higher branches. This, one of the best known deception of the theory of evolution, is totally refuted by the fossil evidence: giraffes were exactly the same 65 million years ago as they are today. There is no trace of any specimens in the fossil record undergoing constant change and growing longer necks in order to reach higher branches. The giraffe today is exactly the same as it was 65 million years ago. |
 |
Boar SkullAge: 58 million years old Darwinists were able to gather their original supporters by using a very primitive logic. In a climate of scientific ignorance, it was easy to convince the public that proteins and eventually, cells could form spontaneously from muddy water that mammals hunting in water eventually developed fins and turned into dolphins and that monkeys decided to stop leaping from tree to tree and instead to walk upright, and thus evolved into human beings. The sciences of genetics and paleontology were unknown, so all these imaginary transitions were depicted as incontrovertible fact. But now Darwinists are in a far more difficult position. The science of genetics has revealed the complex structure of the cell and how traits are passed on from generation to generation. Paleontology has shown that living things have never changed. Countless specimens, such as the 58-million-year-old boar skull shown here indicate that living things exhibited the same complexity millions of years ago as present-day specimens. It is no longer possible for Darwinists to deceive the public. |
 |
Antelope SkullAge: 50 million years old Specimens of these mammals dating back 50 million years have been perfectly preserved. This specimen, also millions of years old, shows that antelopes have never been subjected to any alteration, and neither descended from nor evolved into any other life form. Just like zebras, wolves, tigers and foxes millions of years old, these living things were also created in the manner determined by God, and never changed since. As is the case with all other life forms, there is not a single intermediate form to support the myth of human evolution. As with all other evolutionist claims, this one is completely false. Living things on Earth never evolved. |
 |
Cheetah SkullAge: 7.3 million years old On the basis of some elements of ape behavior, Darwinists maintain that monkeys and human beings are both descended from a common ancestor. They claim that monkeys one day decided to descend from the trees, to walk upright, to speak, sing, and compose music, to construct buildings and to make scientific discoveries, and thus turned into human beings. In that case, similar processes of transition must also apply to other living things. Since cheetahs, for example, are able to run very fast, they should one day be able to alter their physical structures and turn into sentient beings winning gold medals at the Olympic Games. However, a look at the scientific facts reveals that cheetahs, tigers, wolves, fox, lions and leopards—in short, all animals—never changed at all. The same stability or stasis also applies to apes and human beings. Apes have always existed as apes, and human beings as human beings. |
 |
Binturong SkullAge: 88 million years old Darwin imagined that living things changed slowly. In his view, all living things, humans included, were descended from other species and thus arrived at their modern-day appearances. Given that 19th-century science provided no evidence to support his hypothesis, Darwin believed that the intermediate-form fossils that should exist would be found at a later date. Darwin’s closest followers inherited this legacy of belief. Ever since that time, they have ceaselessly looked for the intermediate forms that Darwin believed would eventually be forthcoming. However, it did not take long to realize that Darwin had been mistaken. The unaltered life forms in the fossil record definitively refuted Darwinism. One blow to this superstitious belief, sought to be kept alive solely as an ideology, is the 88-million-year-old binturong skull illustrated. |
 |
Tasmanian Devil SkullAge: 32 million years old The British paleontologist Derek W. Ager describes how the fossil record poses a major difficulty for the theory of evolution: The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find—over and over again—not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another. (Derek A. Ager, “The Nature of the Fossil Record”, Proceedings of the British Geological Association, Vol. 87, 1976, p. 133)One fossil that proves that its species never passed through any intermediate stages is the 32-million-year-old Tasmanian devil skull pictured here.
|
 |
TurtleAge: 98 million years old Darwinists, who maintain that living species are descended from another and develop by constant small changes, are at a loss to explain the stasis, or total stability, observed within those same species. The theory of evolution, which maintains that human beings are descended from apes, must explain why no other life forms underwent the imaginary transition similar to the one from ape to human. Evolutionists have no rational and logical answer to give. Birds never changed. Rhinoceroses, foxes and hyenas never changed; and neither did the 98-million-year old turtle shown here. Neither did human beings. The idea that Darwinists seek to impose on the public—that living things make progress by small changes and eventually develop into other life forms entirely—is a massive lie. |
 |
Polar Bear SkullAge: 74 million years old The Atlas of Creation series and this book offer important evidence that can only add to Darwinists’ panic, showing them that evolution is dead and that they can no longer deceive the world. This 74-million-year-old polar bear skull, for instance, is identical to the skulls of polar bears alive today—sufficient on its own to undermine Darwinists’ arguments. As the evidence increases declaring that Darwinism is invalid, the more Darwinists seek to give the impression that “We are alive and well.” They try to use propaganda techniques to fight an intellectual struggle that they were unable to wage with science. They attempt to cover up studies that demolish Darwinism. But this behavior does not prevent them from seeing, albeit subconsciously, the scale of the collapse that has taken place. |
 |
Coyote SkullAge: 65 million years old When a living thing first appears in the fossil record, it then continues on in the same form for the millions of years that follow. All the fossils illustrated in this book, such as this 65-million-year-old coyote skull, are just a few examples. Like all other life forms, coyotes of 65 million years ago possessed the same appearance and structures as they do today. This totally demolishes the whole concept of evolution. This state of affairs, which applies to all living things, inevitably applies to human beings as well. Humans have always existed as human beings, ever since the moment they were first created, and have never undergone the slightest change. Given that so many life forms clearly refute all claims of evolution, there can be no scientific foundation to the scenarios concerning human evolution dreamed up by Darwinists. The teeth of the fossil illustrated can be seen in full detail, offering significant proof that coyotes living 65 million years ago were identical to those alive today. |
 |
Sassafras LeafAge: 54-37 million years old One of the most familiar forms of Darwinist propaganda are groundless slogans along the lines of “Rejection of the theory of evolution is a dogma,” or “Denying the theory of evolution is unscientific.” In fact, however, such statements are preconceptions based on evolutionists’ biased conception of science. “Science,” according to the Darwinist definition, is not a discipline that researches, investigates and analyses its findings in a neutral manner and then accepts the results of those findings. According to Darwinists, scientific inquiries must first confirm their own beliefs and ideas and in the process, which findings must be interpreted by distorting them in line with evolutionist dogma. To put it another way, evolutionists portray their biased interpretations, rather than the evidence itself, as science. Darwinist science is an attempt not to uncover the facts, but to interpret them selectively and distort them. |
 |
Katsura Tree LeafAge: 65-54 million years One of the most significant facts revealed by the fossil record is that living species appeared in a single moment, together with all their characteristics. In other words, there is no sign any species that developed from a primitive form and slowly began to acquire all its limbs. All living species were flawless and fully formed from the moment they emerged, and those species that have survived are still identical to their original form. The book The Origin of Species Revisited describes how this represents a serious dilemma for Darwinism: The abrupt manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palaeontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection. (The Origin of Species Revisited, p. 46)
|
 |
Ash LeafAge: 23-5 million years old If Darwinists think scientifically, as they claim to, then they should act not in the light of their ideology—their imaginings, in other words—but rather according to facts and the concrete findings. The concrete fact revealed by paleontologists today is that each living species appeared suddenly and has never changed so long as as it has survived. The meaning of this is evident: life never evolved. Like the universe itself, life is the work of God, the Creator. The 23- to 5-million-year-old ash leaf in the picture once again serves as a reminder to everyone. |
 |
Myrica LeafAge: 30 million years old Rather than debate the meaning of scientific findings, Darwinists prefer to resort to psychological propaganda techniques, to restrict freedom of thought by banning works that refute evolution, and to influence the public by adopting a mocking style. They usually employ psychological warfare techniques for that purpose. Evolutionists should not turn a deaf ear to others and resort to slander, insult and flase accusations without even a glance at the available evidence and documentation. If they are truly confident in their theory and possess scientific evidence, they should display it to silence their opposition on an intellectual level. However, they have never yet done so, and it is impossible for them to do so, because Darwinists have not a single piece of evidence to support their theory. |
 |
DiospyrosAge: 40 million years old According to Darwinists’ unscientific claims, date trees, pine trees, cacti, orchids, carnations, roses, cherry trees, grasses, ferns—in short, all plants share the same imaginary forebear. But when asked about the nature of this common forebear, or by what stages different plants diverged from one another and finally assumed their present forms, evolutionists have no scientic response to give. E. J. H. Corner, an evolutionist botanist from Cambridge University, admits that evolutionists have no answers on the subject of the origin of plants: The words of widely recognized evolutionist botanist E.J.H. Corner of Cambridge University still ring true 40 years after he wrote them: “But I still think that, to the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favour of special creation . . . Can you imagine how an orchid, a duckweed, and a palm have come from the same ancestry, and have we any evidence for this assumption? The evolutionist must be prepared with an answer, but I think that most would break down before an inquisition.” ( E.J.H. Corner, Prof of Botany, Cambridge University, England, Evolution in Contemporary Botanical Thought, Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961, p. 97)The level of science and technology of the 21st century has made Corner’s concerns more valid. Countless scientific findings, and the fossil record in particular, have placed Darwinism in an insoluble dilemma—not in the field of botany alone, but in all branches of science. In their intellectual death throes, Darwinists are trying to keep their theory alive and to prepare for questions they may be faced with. Yet they still have not a single scientific answer to give.
|
 |
Araucarian ConeAge: 170 million years old "The overwhelming prevalence of stasis became an embarrassing feature of the fossil record.”(Stephen Jay Gould, “Cordelia's Dilemma,” Natural History, February 1993, p.15)Darwinists’ embarrassment in the face of the fossil record arises from the lie they have propagated for the last 150 years. They spent decades describing how life forms supposedly assumed their present forms by a series of gradual changes and misled the public in what has become a major fraud in the history of science, and are entirely justified in feeling embarrassed by the reality revealed by the fossil record. They should now let that embarrassment lead them to the truth and stop knowingly espousing a lie.
|
 |
Turkey Oak LeafAge: 5-1.8 million years old Most evolutionist books or articles present a great many fantastical tales. These describe processes that could never have taken place and that are scientifically impossible. You’ll read how the first cell emerged from a pool of mud, how fish one day decided to move onto dry land and turned into hundreds of different species and how reptiles one day took to the air as birds. But all these tales are science fiction, and far frombeing scienctific. The main hero of these tales is blind chance. In his book The Great Evolution Mystery, Gordon Rattray Taylor says this on the subject: Evolutionary history is a mass of such modifications; one could almost say it consists of them. Scales become feathers. Legs become wings. Stomachs become swim bladders. Even at the level of biochemical processes, substitutions and elaborations occur. All Darwinism has to say about such miracles is that they are due to chance. (Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, New York: Harper & Row, 1983, p.10)The fact is, however, that chance can never produce an order requiring intelligence and consciousness. No logical person can accept that the variety and complexity displayed by living things are the work of chance. Coincidence can never give rise to bright flowers, delicious fruits and vegetables, leopards, rabbits, tigers, birds, ants and human beings able to found whole civilizations. Life and everything we see around us is the work of Almighty God, the Omniscient Lord of sublime artistry.
|
 |
Juniper LeafAge: 5-1.8 million years Since the early 20th century, the theory of evolution, constantly depicted as a scientific reality by some circles, has received a string of lethal blows—which, however, have been carefully concealed from the public. Darwinists constantly issue propaganda suggesting that nothing has changed, but they never mention the countless fossils that serve as evidence of Creation and continue relating the same, familiar tales. One of the most notable aspects of evolutionist propaganda is that they almost never feel the need to back up their tales with any scientific findings. Phillip Johnson describes the position: There is no requirement that any of this speculation be confirmed either experimental or fossil evidence. To Darwinists, just being able to imagine the process is sufficient to confirm that something like that must have happened. (Phillip Johnson, Objection Sustained, p. 23)On its own, in fact, this situation is proof of Darwinists’ despair. They are obliged to rely on their own imaginations, because scientific data offer their theory no support. Countless fossils, such as the juniper leaf illustrated, prove that evolution never took place. For that reason, Darwinists prefer to seek refuge in speculation rather than seek to explain the evidence.
|
 |
Mountain Ash LeafAge: 50 million years old Mountain ash trees are the same today as they were 50 million years ago. In other words, in the past the Earth was not inhabited by primitive, semi-developed and odd-looking animals and plants, as evolutionists would have us believe. The Earth of 50 million years ago was not filled with life forms busily developing stage by stage. All living things then had the same physical features, limbs and fully formed structures as those living today, and were identical to them in appearance. The fossil pictured is an obvious evidence of that. |
 |
Apple LeafAge: 50 million years old Just as sourcherries have always existed as sourcherries, apples also have always been apples. The apple did not emerge by descent from some other peculiar fruit. Darwin’s claim, proposed some 150 years ago, that living things are descended from one another through very small changes, still lacks any confirmatory evidence, despite the passage of all those years. The evolutionist Richard Darwkins admits this “painful” fact for evolutionists: One hundred and twenty five years on, we know a lot more about animals and plants than Darwin did, and still not a single case is known to me of complex organs that could not have been formed by numerous successive slight modifications. I do not believe that such a case will ever be found. (Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, p.91)
|
 |
Cherry Laurel LeafAge: 50 million years old Cherry laurel trees in the past lived in the same manner as today’s. Were Darwinists telling the truth, then present-day cherry laurel trees should bear no resemblance, or only a partial one, to those of the past. In addition, other fossils should be able to show how the cherry laurel trees of the past turned into the trees of today. But over the last two centuries or so, Darwinists have been unable to obtain any evidence of this process, which exists solely in their imaginations. All the findings made reveal that cherry laurels have always existed as cherry laurels, that they have not evolved, and that they were therefore created. |
 |
TarponAge: 110 million years old In his book Missing Links, Robert A. Martin says: If the creationist model is correct, there can be no ancestor-descendant relationships, no evolutionary progression of any kind. If the evolution model is correct and with a dense enough fossil record, intermediates at all structural and chronological scales should be found. (Robert A. Martin, Missing Links: Evolutionary Concepts and Transitions Through Time, Jones and Barlett Publishers, UK, 2004, p. 8)Without exception, all fossil specimens, of which this book describes only a few show that there is no line of descent between life forms, and that every species emerged suddenly with its own particular characteristics. Excavations have failed to turn up even one semi-developed life form or intermediate form fossil. Given this evidence, it is clear that evolution is invalid, and Creation is an undeniable fact.
|
 |
FilefishAge: 4 million years old Filefish, members of the Monacanthidae family, live in tropical or subtropical waters. There are 107 known species within that family. One of the most important characteristics of most of these species is that they are masters of camouflage, able to conceal themselves by changing color to match their surroundings and thus protect themselves from predators. This Monacanthus fossil is 4 million years old, evident proof that this species never evolved. Living things are not descended from one another by undergoing constant change in the manner suggested by Darwinists. Almighty God created the universe and all the life forms within it. |
 |
OctopusAge: 95 million years old Octopi, whose high capacity for learning has been tested in the laboratory, are also masters of camouflage. This ability depends upon specially created skin cells. Thanks to their skin cells’ ability to change color, become opaque and reflect light, they can protect themselves from danger and also warn other octopi of potential danger. Some octopi do even more: They camouflage themselves by imitating other sea creatures. These, known as “mimic octopi,” assume the appearance of frightening-looking life forms such as lionfish and sea snakes. But could octopi have acquired these features in stages over the course of time, as evolutionists maintain? Were the first octopi strange-looking, semi-developed creatures with rudimentary organs, very different from those living today? One of the main ways of determining this is by examining the fossil record. When we do that, no matter how far back in time we go we encounter fossil octopi exactly the same as their counterparts living today. This is one of the main proofs of the invalidity of evolutionist claims. Octopi did not evolve, but were created by Omniscient and Almighty God, together with all their characteristics. |
 |
SeahorseAge: 4 million years old The seahorse’s head stands at a right angle to its body, a feature is not present in any other fish. That is why seahorses swim upright and can move their heads up and down. However, they cannot move their heads from side to side. Were other living things to have this inability to move their heads from side to side, it would represent a problem exposing them to all kinds of threats. But thanks to the special structure of their body, seahorses never experience any such problem. They have been created able to move their eyes in all directions, independently of one another, and can easily see all round them, even without being able to move their heads from side to side. If Darwinists’ claims were true, then the seahorse should have been eliminated long before it developed this appropriate eye structure, and it should never have survived down to the present day. It should be impossible for a seahorse with an upright head, unable to see behind it, to survive, so seahorses should have become extinct. This means that, like all other living things, seahorses did not evolve, but were in fact created in a single moment, with their heads are attached to their bodies at a right angle, able to move their eyes independently in all directions, and with all their other characteristics. |
 |
PolyipnusAge: 35 million years old Fish of the polyipnus species, members of the family Sternoptychidae are some of the living things that prove that Darwinism is nothing more than speculations. There is no difference between polyipnus living 35 million years ago and those alive today. |
 |
KillfishAge: 3 million years old Evolutionists claim that Darwin’s theory answered the question of how life and living species emerged. Indeed, that’s the reason behind for materialists’ and atheists’ blind devotion to the theory of evolution: They imagine that it gives them an alternative answer to Creation. But this is a grave error. Darwin’s claims have never been verified by any scientific data, neither in his own day or afterwards. On the contrary, science has proved that Darwin’s scenario is impossible. In short, there is no other scientific and rational answer to the question of the origin of life than Creation. The evolutionist paleontologist George Simpson admits how Darwin’s theory fails to answer any questions: Darwin was always utterly helpless to answer any valid objections to his theory. (Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, p. 140)
|
 |
Soldier FishAge: 95 million years old The fossil record shows that living things have not changed over tens or usually hundreds of millions of years. This evident truth represents a major dilemma for Darwinists, as many evolutionists are aware. For example, the evolutionist paleontologist Steven M. Stanley describes how Darwinist accounts are incompatible with fossils: More generally, any topsy-turvy sequence of fossils would force us to rethink our theory. . . (Steven M. Stanley, The New Evolutionary Timetable, New York, 1981, p. 3)One of the countless fossils imposing a review of the facts on evolutionists is the 95-million-year-old soldier fish pictured. Soldier fish have never changed over 95 million years and thus refute evolution.
|
 |
Squirrel FishAge: 50 million years The fossil record shows no gradual, stage-by-stage development of the kind claimed by evolutionists. There’s no evidence that living things are descended from any supposed common ancestor. Findings have revealed that living things are not descended from one another and that no species ever changed for as long as it survived. In other words, species never evolved, as is described by the Oxford University zoologist Mark Pagel: But instead of finding the slow, smooth and progressive changes Lyell and Darwin had expected, they saw in the fossil records rapid bursts of change, new species appearing seemingly out of nowhere and then remaining unchanged for millions of years-patterns hauntingly reminiscent of creation. (Mark Pagel, "Happy Accidents?," Nature 397:665, 25 February 1999)
|
 |
Wolf HerringAge: 95 million years old Because fossils demolish the claims of evolution, Darwinists usually ignore them, or else attempt to use them as tools for propaganda by means of various distortions. However, the recent exhibition of hundreds of fossils in displays, books and websites has made apparent for all to see the quandary facing evolutionists. When you can compare fossils and living specimens side by side, you have no difficulty in realizing that evolution is a lie, and need no further explanation. That is why evolutionists are in a state of panic. They are helplessly watching the global collapse of their theory, from which there can be no return. One proof of the collapse of the theory of evolution is the 95-million-year-old wolf herring fossil illustrated. |
 |
TangAge: 95 million years old In The Origin of Species Revisited, Wendell R. Bird states that the theory of evolution’s claim of intermediate forms is a fantasy: The geological record . . . tells now what it has told from the beginning, that the supposed intermediate forms between the species of different geological periods are imaginary beings, called up merely in support of a fanciful theory. (Wendell R. Bird, The Origin of Species Revisited, Thomas Nelson Inc, December 1991, p. 44)To date, the fossil research has never produced any intermediate-form specimen to support evolutionist claims. No fossil indicating a line of descent between species has ever been unearthed. Tang fish fossils, for instance, never have any semi- or half-developed organs. No matter how far back in time one searches, every fish fossil has exactly the same characteristics as those fish living today. The 95-million-year-old tang fish fossil in the picture is just one example.
|
 |
ShrimpAge: 150 million years old If shrimps really had an evolutionary forebear of the kind that Darwinists maintain, then there should be fossilized examples of what kind of a creature that alleged “proto-shrimp” looked like. Yet the fossil record provides not the slightest evidence that any such ancestor ever lived. Moreover, the fossil record contains no trace at all of any evolutionary stages that shrimps supposedly went through. No “shrimp-like” fossil has ever been found that that has not yet acquired all the particular characteristics of modern-day shrimps. No matter how old they are, all fossilized shrimps are identical to those still living today. The 150-million-year-old shrimp pictured here also possesses all of present-day shrimps’ flawless features. Under these circumstances, no one can speak logically of “shrimp evolution.” Like all other living species, shrimps never evolved at all. Life is the work of our Glorious and Majestic God. |
 |
Blue WhitingAge: 5 million years old The Swedish scientist Søren Løvtrup states that evolution is the greatest deceit of science as thus:
And countless scientific findings, such as the blue whiting in the picture, have already shown that evolution never happened and that it is a great deceit. It is pointless for evolutionists to try to ignore such findings. Running from the truth changes nothing. |
