
Choosing Our Priorities
Summary
This article examines the global imbalance in resource allocation, highlighting the vast sums spent on security and arms compared to humanitarian aid. It emphasizes that a lack of love and an abundance of hatred perpetuate conflicts, leading to immense economic costs and widespread suffering from hunger, poverty, and lack of essential services. The text argues that true peace and security can only be achieved by embracing love and eradicating perverse philosophies through education.
Key Takeaways
- The UN FAO estimates that 50 billion is needed to eradicate world hunger, but only a fraction is collected for humanitarian aid.
- Globally, 9.8 trillion is spent on security annually, and 1.75 trillion on arms purchases, far exceeding humanitarian funds.
- The Global Peace Index shows a 5% contraction in peace over the last seven years, with violence increasing in 100 countries.
- The economic impact of violence and its containment reached 9.8 trillion in 2013, equivalent to 11% of the global economy.
- The article asserts that lovelessness, selfishness, and hatred are the root causes of conflict, making arms and security spending ineffective.
- Achieving true peace requires combating perverse philosophies through global education and promoting the beauty of love.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the global financial disparity between humanitarian aid and military spending?
The UN FAO states that 50 billion is needed to end world hunger, yet only 19% of the required 1.72 billion for malnourished children in the Sahel region has been collected. In stark contrast, 9.8 trillion is spent on security worldwide annually, and 1.75 trillion on arms purchases, revealing a significant imbalance in global priorities.
How has the global state of peace changed in recent years?
According to the Institute for Economics and Peace's 2013 report, there has been a 5% contraction in global peace over the last seven years. This decline follows a period of relative improvement after World War II, with 100 countries becoming less peaceful due to increased violence, particularly in the Middle East and Africa.
What are the economic consequences of global violence and conflict?
The money spent due to civil wars, terrorism, and conflicts reached 9.8 trillion in 2013, equivalent to 11% of the global economy's total revenues. This figure represents 1,350 per person, highlighting the significant economic burden that violence and its containment place on the world economy.
What are the social impacts of the global resource imbalance?
One in eight people globally experiences chronic hunger, with 842 million starving people facing death. Additionally, two billion people live below the poverty threshold, 1.2 billion lack access to safe water, and 800 million lack health services. Millions of children die annually due to inadequate living conditions and malnutrition.
How do lovelessness and hatred contribute to global conflicts?
Loveless and cold approaches cannot stop wars, and trillions spent on security fail to prevent conflicts where brother fights brother and neighbors become hostile. Hatred encourages hatred, and wars lead to new enmities and waves of animosity, making arms an ineffective solution against terror and violence.
What is the most effective approach to ending terror and violence?
The most perfect form of armament against terror and violence is to arm oneself with science and global education. True security cannot be achieved through weapons until the perverse philosophies that fuel terror and violence are eradicated, and people are taught the beauty of love.



