Were all the animals taken on board?

Q: Why is the claim of a global flood considered scientifically unsupported?

A global flood would present impossible logistical challenges, such as the gathering, transportation, and long-term maintenance of all animal species on Earth. Such accounts lack both scientific evidence and rational basis, pointing instead to a localized event as described in the Qur'an.

Q: What type of animals were likely taken on board the Ark?

The animals taken on board the Ark were likely those indigenous to the specific region inhabited by Prophet Noah (pbuh). It is assumed that these were domesticated animals, which were easier to manage, feed, and protect alongside the human survivors.

Q: How does the Qur'anic account align with the concept of a regional flood?

The Qur'an details the flood as a specific event in a particular region. This perspective harmonizes with archaeological and historical evidence, whereas narratives suggesting the entire globe was engulfed do not hold up to scientific or logical scrutiny.

Q: What does the Ark's animal population indicate about the scope of the flood?

The fact that only a specific group of local animals was sheltered indicates that the flood was confined to a limited geographical area. It would be impossible for a single vessel to accommodate the diversity of species found across all continents.

Abstract

This video clarifies the nature of the flood that occurred during the time of Prophet Noah (pbuh). By evaluating the event through the lens of the Qur'an and scientific observation, it explains that the flood was a localized regional occurrence. Viewers will learn why the traditional belief in a global flood contradicts the logical and historical evidence surrounding the preservation of animal life on the Ark.