For years, a one-sided tale has been told in Darwinist mass media, magazines and documentaries under the control of evolutionists: Scientists working impartially in their white coats carefully extract small bone fragments from beneath the earth and piece together man's alleged millions-of-years-long “evolutionary adventure,” almost like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Experts in paleoanthropology supposedly examine “the origin of man and his process of development” on the basis of the fossil record and establish a bridge between the past and the present through remains millions of years old.


However, behind this polished picture lies one of the greatest deceptions in the history of science. When the mask of science is removed, it is immediately apparent that the world of paleoanthropology is by no means as objective as is supposed, and that it undertakes the advocacy of Darwinism at every opportunity. The picture that confronts us consists of evolutionist fallacies, concealed data, intrigues carried out behind closed doors and even frauds committed in plain sight, rather than scientific facts. This article will discuss some of the dirty tricks Darwinism has not hesitated to employ in order to impose the claim of the so-called evolution of man.

Stories Produced from Insufficient Bone Fragments

Unlike branches of science such as physics or chemistry, which are based on concrete data, paleoanthropology is an exceedingly subjective and biased field. The most fundamental reason for this is that evolutionists do not possess even one genuine piece of evidence to support the claim of “human evolution.” In the words of the renowned evolutionist Henry Gee, a former editor of the journal Nature, “Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various interpretations.”


Similarly, the evolutionist biologist Jerry Coyne describes the helplessness in which Darwinism finds itself as follows:

“Like theology, paleoanthropology is a field in which the students far outnumber the objects of study… Whether a humanlike fossil is named as one species or another can turn on matters as small as 0.5 millimeter in the diameter of a tooth, or slight differences in the shape of the thighbone."

That being the case, only one course remains for evolutionists who attempt to construct the entire history of mankind from a few broken and battered bone fragments small enough to fit in the palm of one's hand: To dream wildly and make prophecies! Researcher and author W. R. Fix emphasized this fact in his work titled “The Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution” as follows:

“The human fossil record is still so sparse that those who insist on positive declarations can do nothing more than jump from one hazardous surmise to another and hope that the next dramatic discovery does not make them utter fools.”

Fossils and Data Being Concentrated in the Monopoly of Darwinists

So how can such enormous evolution propaganda be carried out with such incomplete and fragmented fossil findings? The answer is simple: By monopolizing information and concealing the facts from the public!


When a fossil is discovered in the world of paleoanthropology, the researcher or team that finds it keeps the finding in its own hands like “spoils.” Other scientists, even their own colleagues, are not permitted to personally examine the fossil for decades. For example, a detailed technical examination of the Homo habilis fossils found by Louis Leakey (by Prof. Phillip Tobias) could only be published 30 years after the discovery. Likewise, following the discovery of the Forbes’ Quarry (Gibraltar-1) skull, it was not made available to independent researchers through detailed technical monographs for approximately 150 years, while the Steinheim skull was withheld for nearly 70 years, both being kept under the evolutionist monopoly.


Many more examples can be added to those above. Renowned scientists Ian Tattersall and Jeffrey Schwartz criticize this despotic attitude as follows:

“Science is a system of provisional knowledge that constantly requires re-examination and testing. It cannot function as a system in which assertions have to be left unchallenged for want of free access to the primary data.”

There is no doubt that the fallacy of human evolution is one of the most sensitive subjects for Darwinists. For this reason, every kind of speculation is regarded as permissible when it comes to fossils that reveal the history of man. In evolutionist publications, one-sided interpretations based on a few ambiguous photographs and fragmentary findings are imposed on the entire world as the “sole truth.”

The Prof. Reiner Protsch Von Zieten Scandal

One of the shocking frauds of recent times occurred when Reiner Protsch von Zieten, one of Frankfurt University's “world-famous” professors, was exposed. Throughout his 30-year academic career, Prof. Protsch was known as the “authority” who determined the ages of the so-called “Stone Age” fossils in Europe. The entire Darwinist community told the tale of human evolution by citing his datings as references. Anthropology textbooks presented his work as scientific fact.


However, an independent research commission established in 2005 revealed the truth that shocked the scientific world: Professor Protsch had invented all the dates out of his own head for 30 years and had systematically committed fraud.


Precise tests conducted at Oxford University revealed that the Hahnöfersand skull fragment found near Hamburg, which Protsch had proclaimed to be the 36,000-year-old “most vital missing link between Neanderthal and modern man,” was 7,500 years old!


The Paderborn-Sande man, alleged to have lived in 27,400 BC, was established as belonging to a person who had died not long ago, but only 250 years earlier!


The Binshof-Speyer woman, dated to 21,000 BC, was revealed to have lived in 1300 BC.


When Protsch's lies began to emerge and experts sought to examine the fossils, some skull fragments mysteriously disappeared from the professor's safe at the institute. Moreover, it became clear that this supposedly respected professor did not even know how to operate the Carbon-14 dating device he claimed to use; he was expelled from the university, stripped of his titles and convicted of fraud.

The Hobbit Legend and the “Bone Wars”

Disagreements and disputes in paleoanthropology do not remain merely on paper; from time to time, they turn into a kind of “bone war” in which scientists seize one another's excavation sites, take one another to court and even break and crush historical fossils.


One recent example is the fossils found in 2003 in a cave on the Indonesian island of Flores and proclaimed a “great discovery.” They are referred to as “hobbits” because they resemble the tiny people in Tolkien's novel. Following the discovery of the skeletons that evolutionists named Homo floresiensis and added to the human family tree as a new species, what amounted to a war of plunder began among the researchers. The rival group virtually abducted the fossils from the discovery team and locked them away in its own laboratory. After months of fierce disputes and an international crisis, the bones were returned to the discovery team. However, the jawbone had been broken in half, while the hipbone had been shattered as if struck with a sledgehammer.


As various researchers have demonstrated in scientific reports, Flores Man is not a separate species; comprehensive studies published in PNAS have documented that it was a community of Homo sapiens that had undergone genetic and pathological deformation. Features such as dwarfism, a small brain volume, an indistinct jaw and an unusual tooth structure in the Flores bones are not very different from those of pygmy people who still live in the same region today. The designation Homo floresiensis, just like Tolkien's hobbits, is merely a product of the imagination.

Dmanisi Skull 5: The End of Fabricated Species and the Collapsing “Family Tree”

The world of paleoanthropology experienced another serious shock with the 1.8-million-year-old “Dmanisi Skull 5” unearthed in the Dmanisi region of Georgia. The complete and intact fossil, announced to the whole world after being published in the journal Science in 2013, had a small brain volume of only 546 cubic centimeters and a large facial structure. Yet what truly terrified evolutionists, rather than the anatomical peculiarity of the fossil, was that five completely different skulls, which had lived in the same period of time, had been found together in the same narrow cave depression. That was because this meant that the Darwinists' story of the so-called “human family tree” had become worthless overnight. Indeed, the evolutionist paleoanthropologist Bernard Wood was helplessly forced to state that linking all early human fossils to a single lineage and “bringing that whole established structure crashing down on their heads” was exceedingly illogical and unacceptable.


When researchers from the University of Zurich analyzed these five skulls using computerized 3D morphometry, the illusion of “fabricated species” that evolutionists had maintained for years was shattered once again. That was because the anatomical differences among these five people in the same cave were as great as the differences among all the fossils that evolutionists had found across Africa and proclaimed to be the supposed “different evolutionary species.” Christoph Zollikofer of the research team made this historic observation: “Had the braincase and the face of Skull 5 been found as separate fossils at different sites in Africa, they might have been attributed to different species.”


In fact, this is precisely the deception evolutionists have long practiced: Arranging different skulls in museum display cases for years and marketing them as the fabricated “evolutionary stages of man's ancestor”! In other words, discriminating human fossils that are the consequence of racial differences or physical and mental developmental retardation due to disease into artificial and imaginary species solely to keep evolutionist-materialist superstitions alive! It is for this reason that some evolutionist researchers today maintain that the supposed “human evolutionary tree” needs to be drawn in a much simpler form in order to avoid falling into further contradictions.

 

Dirty Stains Engraved in the History of Science

The history of paleoanthropology is full of great fiascoes that occurred when scientific facts gave way to evolutionist-materialist delusions. A few examples will be given here in order to refresh memories:


Piltdown Man (Eoanthropus dawsoni): The shameful fraud in the history of science, fabricated by filing down and combining a human skull with the jawbone of an orangutan and aging them with a potassium dichromate solution, and presented in museums as “great evidence” for a full 40 years.

 

Nebraska Man (Hesperopithecus haroldcookii): The fiasco in which detailed reconstruction illustrations, together with an imaginary mate, the tools he used and his surroundings, were published in the press on the basis of a single molar tooth belonging to an extinct species of wild pig.


Ida (Darwinius masillae): The media bubble marketed to the world media in 2009 through enormous perception-management campaigns with the slogans “the eighth wonder of the world” and “evidence of man's oldest ancestor,” but which was soon understood to be an ordinary fossil of an extinct lemur.

 

Ramapithecus (Ramapithecus brevirostris): The deception that was proclaimed in the 1960s and 70s to be the so-called “definitive evidence of man's oldest bipedal ancestor” on the basis of only a few jaw and tooth fragments, whose drawings were published showing it walking upright like a human, but which was understood to be an extinct species of orangutan when new fossils were found in the 1980s.

The Ramapithecus fossil consisted merely of an incomplete jaw made up of two pieces. Yet evolutionist speculators had no difficulty in depicting Ramapithecus itself, its imaginary family and the imaginary environment in which it lived on the basis of these jaw fragments. After all, the evolutionists' only method was to keep evolution alive not through science, but through images based on the imagination.

The Ramapithecus fossil consisted merely of an incomplete jaw made up of two pieces. Yet evolutionist speculators had no difficulty in depicting Ramapithecus itself, its imaginary family and the imaginary environment in which it lived on the basis of these jaw fragments. After all, the evolutionists' only method was to keep evolution alive not through science, but through images based on the imagination.

Java Man (Pithecanthropus erectus): The manipulation carried out by combining separate bones found 15 meters apart in a riverbed as though they belonged to a single living being, while concealing genuine human skulls found in the same years (Wadjak) from the public for 30 years.


Peking Man (Sinanthropus pekinensis): The disappearance of all the original fossils in 1941, thereby completely eliminating any possibility of verification and leaving behind only photographs and plaster casts.

Conclusion

In summary, all paleontological, anatomical and biological findings clearly reveal that the claim of human evolution is invalid. The fossil record shows us that throughout history, human beings have remained human beings and apes have remained apes. There is no concrete evidence whatsoever of any kinship between man and ape; there are only frauds, distortions, deceptions, misleading drawings and imaginary interpretations.


All these historical and present-day facts clearly show that certain evolutionist scientists can readily distort data under the guise of paleoanthropology, openly and recklessly commit fraud and resort without hesitation to every kind of deception. They regard every kind of trickery, fraud or lawlessness as “valid” in order to keep Darwinism standing.


The fossil record proclaims that the imaginary “half-human, half-ape” transitional forms that evolutionists have sought for more than a century never lived. All the fossils found belong either to extinct ape species or to different human races that lived in different periods of history. There is not a single skull or even a single bone fragment that Darwinists can present as evidence for the so-called evolution of man. The unsound method of Darwinists, who cannot admit this truth, is to continue the deception by manufacturing false transitional-form fossils.


Man is not the work of blind coincidences, chance events or primitive natural processes. With his reason, soul, consciousness and the flawless systems in his body, he was created in complete perfection by God, the Lord of the heavens and the earth.

 

References:
 
https://www.netcevap.org/insanin-evrimi-yalani/homo-floresiensis-ayri-bir-tur/
https://www.netcevap.org/insanin-evrimi-yalani/radikalin-dmanisi-fosili-uzerindeki-carpitmasi/
https://www.harunyahya.info/kitaplar/evrim-aldatmacasi
https://www.harunyahya.info/kitaplar/evrim-aldatmacasi/bolum/bolum-8-evrim-sahtekarliklari